Review: The Corset by Laura Purcell

39098246Verdict: Phrenology creeps me out.

My rating: 3 out of 5 stars

Genre: Historical/ Gothic Fiction

Published by Bloomsbury Publishing UK / Raven Books, September 20th 2018

Find it on Goodreads.

Is prisoner Ruth Butterham mad or a murderer? Victim or villain?

Dorothea and Ruth. Prison visitor and prisoner. Powerful and powerless. Dorothea Truelove is young, wealthy and beautiful. Ruth Butterham is young, poor and awaiting trial for murder.

When Dorothea’s charitable work leads her to Oakgate Prison, she is delighted with the chance to explore her fascination with phrenology and test her hypothesis that the shape of a person’s skull can cast a light on their darkest crimes. But when she meets teenage seamstress Ruth, she is faced with another theory: that it is possible to kill with a needle and thread. For Ruth attributes her crimes to a supernatural power inherent in her stitches.

The story Ruth has to tell of her deadly creations – of bitterness and betrayal, of death and dresses – will shake Dorothea’s belief in rationality and the power of redemption.

Can Ruth be trusted? Is she mad, or a murderer?

I got retroactive FOMO for Laura Purcell’s novel The Silent Companions because everybody seemed to be raving about it, so I knew I needed to read this one. Especially because it focusses on two women, one of them being a prisoner on trial for murder. I love books featuring unapologetically difficult women and Ruth and Dorothea definitely fit the bill.

Dorothea Truelove is a young, unmarried woman, with plenty of suitors who would rather spend her time doing charity work (do not take her to be a kind person though, she really is not). She is most interested in prisons, as she has a strongly developed theory of phrenology that she feels the need to prove (which proves my point about her being maybe not the best person). As such, Ruth seems to be the perfect specimen to research for her: Ruth is sixteen and in prison awaiting her trial that will most likely lead to her execution for murder. The story is told in these dual perspectives, where Ruth is telling her story to Dorothea and the reader is along for the ride to figure out whether Ruth truly killed her mistress with her magic needle work.

For me, this was a really uneven reading experience. While I for the most part really enjoyed Ruth’s perspective and the ambiguity of her story, Dorothea’s part of the book did not work for me (except for the last chapter). Ruth is a compelling character, whose tough and hatred-filled veneer starts to crack the further her story developes. She is still so childlike while being so very broken, it hurt my heart. Dorothea on the other hand with  her boring social life and her creepy obsession with phrenology did not quite keep my interest. This might be different for readers from different countries, but for me phrenology itself makes me very uncomfortable. I do not want to read about this and did not realize how obsessive Dorothea would be describing everybody’s skull (there is an in-story reason for this – but it did not change my gut reaction to this).

Furthermore, I found quite a bit of Ruth’s backstory to toe the line to torture porn, which probably says more about me as a reader than about the book to be honest. I would have liked to have these scenes be a little bit more scarcely used.

However, I found the ending to be very satisfying – Laura Purcell pulls together the two storylines in a really wonderful way. I was fine with the men’s storylines to be unresolved because in the end – this is a book about Ruth and Dorothea.

I received an arc of this book courtesy of NetGalley and Bloomsbury Publishing UK / Raven Books in exchange for an honest review.

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Review: The Corset by Laura Purcell

    1. Thank you! I think I have mostly seen fairly negative reviews (I checked Goodreads when I was half way through to make sure my lukewarm reaction wasn’t just a genre thing. Me and historical fiction and all.)

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Very good review! I loved the book, but was more than aware that Dorothea’s sections wouldn’t work as well as Ruth’s for some readers. For me, they acted as much needed breathing space amidst the brutality of Ruth’s story, and to highlight the lack of control for the two women, despite their vastly different class and social standing.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I have spoilery thoughts on why I think that if I had twigged to where Dorothea’s story was going I would have enjoyed it more. The reverse kind of mirroring of their storylines maybe? Also, I mean, the phrenology obsession must have been on purpose with all the icky connotations. (does the UK have a history of people using phrenology to explain why some groups of people are less? Or is that only Germany and the Scandinavian countries?) What I am saying is, I guess, that I have an appreciation for the craft but didn’t always enjoy my reading experience.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. That’s very interesting; I’m not aware of phrenology playing a big part in UK social history, so perhaps it was a bigger deal in Germany and Scandinavia?

        And I know what you mean about appreciation vs enjoyment; there are definitely reads that strike a complex balance between the two!

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Interesting. Because for the whole book, whenever Dorothea thinks about phrenology, all I could think about was the Swedish National Museum where I saw an exhibition about the way the Swedish treated the Sami and used their supposedly smaller heads as proof why they weren’t people. And wasn’t there this whole movement of violently fixing people’s personalities by hammering on their bumps on the heads?

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Wow, that’s brutal! I clearly don’t know enough about its history or impact, other than it was clearly very misguided. Still, the notion of fate vs free will that it called into question in the book was very interesting.

        Liked by 1 person

      4. Oh definitely. Which is why I am sure if I had seen the ending coming, lots of things about Dorothea would have read differently. Because in retrospect, Laura Purcell constructs her with such care.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s